<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outlook 2010 and HTML Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:57:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justino</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-5414</link>
		<dc:creator>Justino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 03:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-5414</guid>
		<description>It would seem that Microsoft doesn&#039;t really care - or they&#039;re thinking we don&#039;t really worry about all of you developers who are spending (wasting) hours of time fixing emails so they run on Outlook 2007 for clients.   Hey, we&#039;re Microsoft and we call the shots.  Who would like to set up a site where we can log our hours that we spend working on MS bugs (remember all of the IE 6 bugs that we had to fix and charge clients for)??

Word for HTML rendering?  Absurd.  That&#039;s like having a bag of dog poop used to hold down your table cloth for a picnic on a windy day.

Ah Google Apps sound so good; hopefully, we&#039;ll see MS go away someday or whittle down to a has been in the world of IT.   Listen to your customers.  Listen to your users.  Hey, just for fun, go to the MS site that describes the incompatibilities of Outlook 2007 - read the comments from developers.  And, not much from MS in terms of - we&#039;ll fix it.  We hear you.  We love our customer.  Not.    They love your money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem that Microsoft doesn&#8217;t really care &#8211; or they&#8217;re thinking we don&#8217;t really worry about all of you developers who are spending (wasting) hours of time fixing emails so they run on Outlook 2007 for clients.   Hey, we&#8217;re Microsoft and we call the shots.  Who would like to set up a site where we can log our hours that we spend working on MS bugs (remember all of the IE 6 bugs that we had to fix and charge clients for)??</p>
<p>Word for HTML rendering?  Absurd.  That&#8217;s like having a bag of dog poop used to hold down your table cloth for a picnic on a windy day.</p>
<p>Ah Google Apps sound so good; hopefully, we&#8217;ll see MS go away someday or whittle down to a has been in the world of IT.   Listen to your customers.  Listen to your users.  Hey, just for fun, go to the MS site that describes the incompatibilities of Outlook 2007 &#8211; read the comments from developers.  And, not much from MS in terms of &#8211; we&#8217;ll fix it.  We hear you.  We love our customer.  Not.    They love your money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raul Cordova</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-5066</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul Cordova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 01:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-5066</guid>
		<description>Making every email program HTML compatible only makes sense. So, let us unite and force microsoft to comply to the standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making every email program HTML compatible only makes sense. So, let us unite and force microsoft to comply to the standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Gough</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4942</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Gough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-4942</guid>
		<description>Have you see Outlook 2010 x64 rendering? Random to say the least, font-sizing is out, the style element causes major issues. Then you click forward, the rendering engine changes and fixes itself. Well apart from the weird OL issue I&#039;m having, font, size and color lost on first digit.

I can see things getting worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you see Outlook 2010 x64 rendering? Random to say the least, font-sizing is out, the style element causes major issues. Then you click forward, the rendering engine changes and fixes itself. Well apart from the weird OL issue I&#8217;m having, font, size and color lost on first digit.</p>
<p>I can see things getting worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb Augur</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4926</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb Augur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-4926</guid>
		<description>Hey Claudio,

That works perfectly! I&#039;ve been searching for an answer for at least and hour and your method worked the first time I tried it.

Thank you very much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Claudio,</p>
<p>That works perfectly! I&#8217;ve been searching for an answer for at least and hour and your method worked the first time I tried it.</p>
<p>Thank you very much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudio</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4878</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-4878</guid>
		<description>Hi. I have a VERY simple solution to the problem. The fact that I am not an IT expert probably helped me to find something really simple...

1) Create your nice html signature file with any html editor.
2) Save it as something.html, then open the same file with MS Word
3) Within Outlook 2010, create a new signature with some name and leave the window open.
4) Go back to Word, where your signature is being displayed, copy and then paste it into the signature editing box in Outlook.

That&#039;s it! It worked for me (Windows 7 64 bit + Outlook 2010)....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I have a VERY simple solution to the problem. The fact that I am not an IT expert probably helped me to find something really simple&#8230;</p>
<p>1) Create your nice html signature file with any html editor.<br />
2) Save it as something.html, then open the same file with MS Word<br />
3) Within Outlook 2010, create a new signature with some name and leave the window open.<br />
4) Go back to Word, where your signature is being displayed, copy and then paste it into the signature editing box in Outlook.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it! It worked for me (Windows 7 64 bit + Outlook 2010)&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-3742</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-3742</guid>
		<description>I found a solution to the Outlook 2010 signature thing. As it turns out you can use a Dreamweaver-created / HTML signature in Outlook 2010. On your hard drive (mine = windows XP) Outlook 2010 stores the signature in HTML form.

What you do is create a blank one in Outlook 2010 and save it. Then find it on the hard drive, take your nice pretty one and rename it to the same thing as this Outlook one, then replace the Outlook signature file.on the hard drive. I can get into it more but I was equally frustrated at Outlook 2010 and this whole signature nonsense. On the old Outlook all you had to do was brows the hard drive for your signature file. The new one is complicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a solution to the Outlook 2010 signature thing. As it turns out you can use a Dreamweaver-created / HTML signature in Outlook 2010. On your hard drive (mine = windows XP) Outlook 2010 stores the signature in HTML form.</p>
<p>What you do is create a blank one in Outlook 2010 and save it. Then find it on the hard drive, take your nice pretty one and rename it to the same thing as this Outlook one, then replace the Outlook signature file.on the hard drive. I can get into it more but I was equally frustrated at Outlook 2010 and this whole signature nonsense. On the old Outlook all you had to do was brows the hard drive for your signature file. The new one is complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-3741</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-3741</guid>
		<description>THERE IS A SOLUTION!
I spent about an hour looking up ways that I can take my wonderful HTML code from Dreamweaver and paste it into a new message in Outlook 2010. As I found out over and over and over and over, there is no way to do so. Then a co-worker of mine who does not know coding from a whole-in-the-wall asked what about the old Outlook?

She was right! My office recently upgraded to Office / Outlook 2010 HOWEVER luckily the one SMART thing Microsoft did was they never remove the old Outlook in the upgrade process. I suppose they did this because of the whole archiving thing. Any smart person knows that you never delete any email message, even the spam ones.  You should always keep EVERYTHING as evidence even if it’s utter junk email. Keeping the old Outlook does come in handy if you need to go back to old archives.  Obviously when I upgraded to Outlook 2010 I disabled the email accounts in the old Outlook.


Anywase… back to the solution:

1. In the old Outlook (mine was 2004) disable all the auto send/receive options so that you only send an email message when you want and not automatically when you hit “Send”

2. Disable the provision where the Old Outlook will check for messages automatically every certain amount of minutes. Make sure the old Outlook NEVER checks for messages automatically.

3. Re-establish your email account onto the old Outlook

4. Copy your HTML code (for me it was from Dreamweaver)

5. Create a new email message in the Old Outlook and switch to the SOURCE tab

6. Paste your HTML code into the message

7. Send the email! If it’s a newsletter you’ll have to also get the address book but that’s another issue altogether.


In conclusion I never use the old Outlook other than to send these HTML emails but it works. Shame on Microsoft for taking something that was so user-friendly and messing it up. Would it be so hard to allow us to copy/paste out HTML into Outlook 2010???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THERE IS A SOLUTION!<br />
I spent about an hour looking up ways that I can take my wonderful HTML code from Dreamweaver and paste it into a new message in Outlook 2010. As I found out over and over and over and over, there is no way to do so. Then a co-worker of mine who does not know coding from a whole-in-the-wall asked what about the old Outlook?</p>
<p>She was right! My office recently upgraded to Office / Outlook 2010 HOWEVER luckily the one SMART thing Microsoft did was they never remove the old Outlook in the upgrade process. I suppose they did this because of the whole archiving thing. Any smart person knows that you never delete any email message, even the spam ones.  You should always keep EVERYTHING as evidence even if it’s utter junk email. Keeping the old Outlook does come in handy if you need to go back to old archives.  Obviously when I upgraded to Outlook 2010 I disabled the email accounts in the old Outlook.</p>
<p>Anywase… back to the solution:</p>
<p>1. In the old Outlook (mine was 2004) disable all the auto send/receive options so that you only send an email message when you want and not automatically when you hit “Send”</p>
<p>2. Disable the provision where the Old Outlook will check for messages automatically every certain amount of minutes. Make sure the old Outlook NEVER checks for messages automatically.</p>
<p>3. Re-establish your email account onto the old Outlook</p>
<p>4. Copy your HTML code (for me it was from Dreamweaver)</p>
<p>5. Create a new email message in the Old Outlook and switch to the SOURCE tab</p>
<p>6. Paste your HTML code into the message</p>
<p>7. Send the email! If it’s a newsletter you’ll have to also get the address book but that’s another issue altogether.</p>
<p>In conclusion I never use the old Outlook other than to send these HTML emails but it works. Shame on Microsoft for taking something that was so user-friendly and messing it up. Would it be so hard to allow us to copy/paste out HTML into Outlook 2010???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT Buff</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-3555</link>
		<dc:creator>IT Buff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-3555</guid>
		<description>Well I&#039;ve been trying to demonstrate to a client the simple (cough cough cough) method of embeding html image icons like facebook an tweeter to the bottom of their emails with a border.

Since I can wip something up in seconds in dreamweaver I quickly made up a simple but nice html signature ready to insert into outlook.

2 hours later.... After reading all the useless threats of &quot;How Tos&quot; insert html into outlook 2010 I realised that no-one really knows how, yet they do post methods that just dont exist.

Over the last 2 years Microsoft have really got on my nerves with the nonsense they release. Its like showing a kid a new toy with pretty pictures and amazing glowing things, then they pick it up and it breaks within minutes... This is  the new Microsoft...

Its time this useless company move out of the way and let a real team of developers and strategic researchers prove that we are advanced in technology ! 

This constant upgrade of desktop images over functionality has got to stop....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;ve been trying to demonstrate to a client the simple (cough cough cough) method of embeding html image icons like facebook an tweeter to the bottom of their emails with a border.</p>
<p>Since I can wip something up in seconds in dreamweaver I quickly made up a simple but nice html signature ready to insert into outlook.</p>
<p>2 hours later&#8230;. After reading all the useless threats of &#8220;How Tos&#8221; insert html into outlook 2010 I realised that no-one really knows how, yet they do post methods that just dont exist.</p>
<p>Over the last 2 years Microsoft have really got on my nerves with the nonsense they release. Its like showing a kid a new toy with pretty pictures and amazing glowing things, then they pick it up and it breaks within minutes&#8230; This is  the new Microsoft&#8230;</p>
<p>Its time this useless company move out of the way and let a real team of developers and strategic researchers prove that we are advanced in technology ! </p>
<p>This constant upgrade of desktop images over functionality has got to stop&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silviya Howe</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-3530</link>
		<dc:creator>Silviya Howe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-3530</guid>
		<description>What a shame. Back to tables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a shame. Back to tables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Herman</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-404</guid>
		<description>My favorite part was that Microsoft&#039;s own marketing campaigns are thwarted due to their own crappy product. The post below says it all.

&quot;Tim Dawson said:
&quot;[click here to] Read this issue online if you can’t see the images or are using Outlook 2007.&quot; 

- Quoted from the official Microsoft Xbox newsletter.

Even your companies own marketing teams cant send out appealing newsletters using the tools you are providing. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite part was that Microsoft&#8217;s own marketing campaigns are thwarted due to their own crappy product. The post below says it all.</p>
<p>&#8220;Tim Dawson said:<br />
&#8220;[click here to] Read this issue online if you can’t see the images or are using Outlook 2007.&#8221; </p>
<p>- Quoted from the official Microsoft Xbox newsletter.</p>
<p>Even your companies own marketing teams cant send out appealing newsletters using the tools you are providing. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle steed</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle steed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-401</guid>
		<description>I can understand the fact that Microsoft is the largest software company in the world and that they have to make changes more gradual than other small companies, but what I don&#039;t sympathize with is their continued support and development of products (and standards) that are less than stellar. (I use that term loosely.)

I think it&#039;s easy to associate any/all Microsoft employees with the company itself, thereby assuming they&#039;re all bent on the destruction of good design and development. But I think it&#039;s safe to say that there are some good people there that want to make a difference. I haven&#039;t met any of them personally, but from the post above it looks like David Greiner has talked with a few.

In my personal opinion, I would&#039;ve liked to seen the FixOutlook.org site really make a difference in Microsoft&#039;s stance. It&#039;s just downright ugly to see MS Word as an HTML rendering system. *UGH* And to think that they better supported CSS 9-10 years ago is a huge laugh. I&#039;m not sure what they were thinking on that one. So my final answer, yes, Microsoft is wrong for still planning to use MS Word for HTML emails. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the fact that Microsoft is the largest software company in the world and that they have to make changes more gradual than other small companies, but what I don&#8217;t sympathize with is their continued support and development of products (and standards) that are less than stellar. (I use that term loosely.)</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s easy to associate any/all Microsoft employees with the company itself, thereby assuming they&#8217;re all bent on the destruction of good design and development. But I think it&#8217;s safe to say that there are some good people there that want to make a difference. I haven&#8217;t met any of them personally, but from the post above it looks like David Greiner has talked with a few.</p>
<p>In my personal opinion, I would&#8217;ve liked to seen the FixOutlook.org site really make a difference in Microsoft&#8217;s stance. It&#8217;s just downright ugly to see MS Word as an HTML rendering system. *UGH* And to think that they better supported CSS 9-10 years ago is a huge laugh. I&#8217;m not sure what they were thinking on that one. So my final answer, yes, Microsoft is wrong for still planning to use MS Word for HTML emails. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Woods</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-357</guid>
		<description>One of the most embarrassing moves from Microsoft this year. Plenty more to follow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most embarrassing moves from Microsoft this year. Plenty more to follow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Way</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>M Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-341</guid>
		<description>One of my favorite quotes by a Microsoft employee is from one of their reps that spoke at a conference in NYC last year - he said (verbatim): &quot;So, I know a lot of you don&#039;t like us.  We know we suck... but we&#039;re trying to get better.&quot;  Are they?

It&#039;s hard to say.  Ultimately, there is no short-term solution - at least, not a feasible one.  Microsoft will continue to treat its products and the market the same way it always has: by relying on the masses of its technically-unsavvy end users to support whatever &quot;Microsoft standard&quot; it feels it should be enforcing.  To be fair, none of this really matters for most of their products.

They&#039;re really not the only evil, though: every major browser rendering engine has a different interpretation (however minor or major) of standards.  In any case, I think that FixOutlook.org is really just a glimpse at a much larger, more abstract issue.  I don&#039;t particularly think that Microsoft will respect the view of a small developer audience (compared to its end users in general) unless they start catching major heat (eg more than angry bloggers and small organizations), but I do think it&#039;s worth voicing, especially if it helps you sleep at night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite quotes by a Microsoft employee is from one of their reps that spoke at a conference in NYC last year &#8211; he said (verbatim): &#8220;So, I know a lot of you don&#8217;t like us.  We know we suck&#8230; but we&#8217;re trying to get better.&#8221;  Are they?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to say.  Ultimately, there is no short-term solution &#8211; at least, not a feasible one.  Microsoft will continue to treat its products and the market the same way it always has: by relying on the masses of its technically-unsavvy end users to support whatever &#8220;Microsoft standard&#8221; it feels it should be enforcing.  To be fair, none of this really matters for most of their products.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re really not the only evil, though: every major browser rendering engine has a different interpretation (however minor or major) of standards.  In any case, I think that FixOutlook.org is really just a glimpse at a much larger, more abstract issue.  I don&#8217;t particularly think that Microsoft will respect the view of a small developer audience (compared to its end users in general) unless they start catching major heat (eg more than angry bloggers and small organizations), but I do think it&#8217;s worth voicing, especially if it helps you sleep at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

