<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outlook 2010 and HTML Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:14:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek Herman</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-404</guid>
		<description>My favorite part was that Microsoft&#039;s own marketing campaigns are thwarted due to their own crappy product. The post below says it all.

&quot;Tim Dawson said:
&quot;[click here to] Read this issue online if you can’t see the images or are using Outlook 2007.&quot; 

- Quoted from the official Microsoft Xbox newsletter.

Even your companies own marketing teams cant send out appealing newsletters using the tools you are providing. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite part was that Microsoft&#8217;s own marketing campaigns are thwarted due to their own crappy product. The post below says it all.</p>
<p>&#8220;Tim Dawson said:<br />
&#8220;[click here to] Read this issue online if you can’t see the images or are using Outlook 2007.&#8221; </p>
<p>- Quoted from the official Microsoft Xbox newsletter.</p>
<p>Even your companies own marketing teams cant send out appealing newsletters using the tools you are providing. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle steed</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle steed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-401</guid>
		<description>I can understand the fact that Microsoft is the largest software company in the world and that they have to make changes more gradual than other small companies, but what I don&#039;t sympathize with is their continued support and development of products (and standards) that are less than stellar. (I use that term loosely.)

I think it&#039;s easy to associate any/all Microsoft employees with the company itself, thereby assuming they&#039;re all bent on the destruction of good design and development. But I think it&#039;s safe to say that there are some good people there that want to make a difference. I haven&#039;t met any of them personally, but from the post above it looks like David Greiner has talked with a few.

In my personal opinion, I would&#039;ve liked to seen the FixOutlook.org site really make a difference in Microsoft&#039;s stance. It&#039;s just downright ugly to see MS Word as an HTML rendering system. *UGH* And to think that they better supported CSS 9-10 years ago is a huge laugh. I&#039;m not sure what they were thinking on that one. So my final answer, yes, Microsoft is wrong for still planning to use MS Word for HTML emails. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the fact that Microsoft is the largest software company in the world and that they have to make changes more gradual than other small companies, but what I don&#8217;t sympathize with is their continued support and development of products (and standards) that are less than stellar. (I use that term loosely.)</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s easy to associate any/all Microsoft employees with the company itself, thereby assuming they&#8217;re all bent on the destruction of good design and development. But I think it&#8217;s safe to say that there are some good people there that want to make a difference. I haven&#8217;t met any of them personally, but from the post above it looks like David Greiner has talked with a few.</p>
<p>In my personal opinion, I would&#8217;ve liked to seen the FixOutlook.org site really make a difference in Microsoft&#8217;s stance. It&#8217;s just downright ugly to see MS Word as an HTML rendering system. *UGH* And to think that they better supported CSS 9-10 years ago is a huge laugh. I&#8217;m not sure what they were thinking on that one. So my final answer, yes, Microsoft is wrong for still planning to use MS Word for HTML emails. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Woods</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-357</guid>
		<description>One of the most embarrassing moves from Microsoft this year. Plenty more to follow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most embarrassing moves from Microsoft this year. Plenty more to follow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Way</title>
		<link>http://fuelyourcoding.com/outlook-2010-and-html-email/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>M Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuelyourcoding.com/?p=363#comment-341</guid>
		<description>One of my favorite quotes by a Microsoft employee is from one of their reps that spoke at a conference in NYC last year - he said (verbatim): &quot;So, I know a lot of you don&#039;t like us.  We know we suck... but we&#039;re trying to get better.&quot;  Are they?

It&#039;s hard to say.  Ultimately, there is no short-term solution - at least, not a feasible one.  Microsoft will continue to treat its products and the market the same way it always has: by relying on the masses of its technically-unsavvy end users to support whatever &quot;Microsoft standard&quot; it feels it should be enforcing.  To be fair, none of this really matters for most of their products.

They&#039;re really not the only evil, though: every major browser rendering engine has a different interpretation (however minor or major) of standards.  In any case, I think that FixOutlook.org is really just a glimpse at a much larger, more abstract issue.  I don&#039;t particularly think that Microsoft will respect the view of a small developer audience (compared to its end users in general) unless they start catching major heat (eg more than angry bloggers and small organizations), but I do think it&#039;s worth voicing, especially if it helps you sleep at night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite quotes by a Microsoft employee is from one of their reps that spoke at a conference in NYC last year &#8211; he said (verbatim): &#8220;So, I know a lot of you don&#8217;t like us.  We know we suck&#8230; but we&#8217;re trying to get better.&#8221;  Are they?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to say.  Ultimately, there is no short-term solution &#8211; at least, not a feasible one.  Microsoft will continue to treat its products and the market the same way it always has: by relying on the masses of its technically-unsavvy end users to support whatever &#8220;Microsoft standard&#8221; it feels it should be enforcing.  To be fair, none of this really matters for most of their products.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re really not the only evil, though: every major browser rendering engine has a different interpretation (however minor or major) of standards.  In any case, I think that FixOutlook.org is really just a glimpse at a much larger, more abstract issue.  I don&#8217;t particularly think that Microsoft will respect the view of a small developer audience (compared to its end users in general) unless they start catching major heat (eg more than angry bloggers and small organizations), but I do think it&#8217;s worth voicing, especially if it helps you sleep at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
